4.5 Article

Noninvasive assessment of diabetic foot ulcers with diffuse photon density wave methodology: pilot human study

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.3275467

Keywords

frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy; diffuse photon density wave; chronic diabetic foot ulcers; wound healing; optical absorption coefficient; oxygenated hemoglobin; deoxygenated hemoglobin

Funding

  1. Wallace H. Coulter Foundation
  2. U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity [W81XWH 04-1-0419]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A pilot human study is conducted to evaluate the potential of using diffuse photon density wave (DPDW) methodology at near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths (685 to 830 nm) to monitor changes in tissue hemoglobin concentration in diabetic foot ulcers. Hemoglobin concentration is measured by DPDW in 12 human wounds for a period ranging from 10 to 61 weeks. In all wounds that healed completely, gradual decreases in optical absorption coefficient, oxygenated hemoglobin concentration, and total hemoglobin concentration are observed between the first and last measurements. In nonhealing wounds, the rates of change of these properties are nearly zero or slightly positive, and a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) is observed in the rates of change between healing and nonhealing wounds. Differences in the variability of DPDW measurements over time are observed between healing and nonhealing wounds, and this variance may also be a useful indicator of nonhealing wounds. Our results demonstrate that DPDW methodology with a frequency domain NIR device can differentiate healing from nonhealing diabetic foot ulcers, and indicate that it may have clinical utility in the evaluation of wound healing potential. (C) 2009 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. [DOI: 10.1117/1.3275467]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available