4.5 Review

Nanostructured Surface Modification to Bone Implants for Bone Regeneration

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 628-648

Publisher

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2018.2516

Keywords

Bone Defect; Surface Modification; Nanotopography; Osseointegration; Osteoimmunemodulation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC31525009, NSFC31271021]
  2. National 863 project [2015AA020316]
  3. Sichuan Innovative Research Team Program for Young Scientists [2016TD0004]
  4. Zhejiang Provincial Science and Technology Grant [2017C33100]
  5. Wenzhou Municipal Science and Technology Grant [Y20160042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bone defect repair is a complex process of bone regeneration. Bone substitute implanted at the bone defect sites act as three-dimensional scaffolds that guide and promote bone regeneration. The function of orthopedic implants is often limited by complicating factors such as insufficient integration into host tissue, inflammatory reactions, and infection. Biological behaviors of immune cells and osteogenesis-related cells on these bone biomaterials are largely determined by the surface properties. The advances in nanofabrication technology have help us fabricated a range of nanostructured surface with controlled physicochemical properties to modulate the behaviors of osteogenesis-related cells and immune cells, thus affecting bone integration and local immune reaction. In this review, we summary the development of nanostructured surface modification to bone implants with controlled physicochemical properties, including roughness, wettability, surface charge and topography. In particular, we focus on the effect of nanotopographies on cell recruitment and cellular adhesion, osteogenic differentiation, mineralization and osseointegration, antibacterial activities, and modulation of immune response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available