4.5 Article

Cellulose and Collagen Derived Micro-Nano Structured Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 719-731

Publisher

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2013.1574

Keywords

Polysaccharide Bone Grafts; Cellulose; Collagen; Micro-Nano Structure; Human Osteoblasts

Funding

  1. Institute of Regenerative Engineering
  2. Center for Science and Technology Commercialization, University of Connecticut

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scaffold based bone tissue engineering (BTE) has made great progress in regenerating lost bone tissue. Materials of natural and synthetic origin have been used for scaffold fabrication. Scaffolds derived from natural polymers offer greater bioactivity and biocompatibility with mammalian tissues to favor tissue healing, due to their similarity to native extracellular matrix (ECM) components. Often it is a challenge to fabricate natural polymer based scaffolds for BTE applications without compromising their bioactivity, while maintaining adequate mechanical properties. In this work, we report the fabrication and characterization of cellulose and collagen based micro-nano structured scaffolds using human osteoblasts (HOB) for BTE applications. These porous micro-nano structured scaffolds (average pore diameter 190 +/- 10 mu m) exhibited mechanical properties in the mid range of human trabecular bone (compressive modulus 266.75 +/- 33.22 MPa and strength 12.15 +/- 2.23 MPa). These scaffolds supported the greater adhesion and phenotype maintenance of cultured HOB as reflected by higher levels of osteogenic enzyme alkaline phosphatase and mineral deposition compared to control polyester micro-nano structured scaffolds of identical pore properties. These natural polymer based micro-nano structured scaffolds may serve as alternatives to polyester based scaffolds for BTE applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available