4.7 Review

Redox Strategies for Crop Improvement

Journal

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
Volume 23, Issue 14, Pages 1186-1205

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2014.6033

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ghent University (Multidisciplinary Research Partnership Biotechnology for a Sustainable Economy) [01MRB510W]
  2. VIB and Marie Curie [OMICS@VIB PCOFUND-GA-2010-267139]
  3. FWO (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen)
  4. European Cooperation in Science and Technology [COST Action BM1203 EU-ROS]
  5. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Program [IUAP P7/29 MARS]
  6. Belgian Science Policy Office
  7. European Cooperation in Science and Research by FWO through a Pegasus post-doctoral grant [COST Action BM1203/EU-ROS]
  8. IWT through a predoctoral fellowship
  9. VIB through a predoctoral scholarship (International PhD Program in Life Sciences)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Significance: Recently, the agro-biotech industry has been driven by overcoming the limitations imposed by fluctuating environmental stress conditions on crop productivity. A common theme among (a)biotic stresses is the perturbation of the redox homeostasis. Recent Advances: As a strategy to engineer stress-tolerant crops, many approaches have been centered on restricting the negative impact of reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation. Critical Issues: In this study, we discuss the scientific background of the existing redox-based strategies to improve crop performance and quality. In this respect, a special focus goes to summarizing the current patent landscape because this aspect is very often ignored, despite constituting the forefront of applied research. Future Directions: The current increased understanding of ROS acting as signaling molecules has opened new avenues to exploit redox biology for crop improvement required for sustainable food security. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 23, 1186-1205.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available