4.4 Article

Hyaluronic acid hydrogel modified with nogo-66 receptor antibody and poly-L-lysine to promote axon regrowth after spinal cord injury

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31689

Keywords

spinal cord injury; hyaluronic acid scaffold; nogo-66 receptor antibody; adhesion; poly-(L)-lysine

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2005CB623905, 2007CB947704]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30670656, 50973052]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of Beijing [705001]
  4. Beijing Scientific Committee [20005187040311]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The biomaterials used for central nervous system injury require not only interacting with specific cell adhesion but also specific growth factor receptors to promote nerve regeneration. In this study, hyaluronic acid (HA)-based hydrogels modified with poly-L-lysine (PLL) and nogo-66 receptor antibody (antiNgR) (HA-PLL/antiNgR) were administered to rats after lateral hemisection of the spinal cord. Anti-neurofilament positive axons were found to extend into the HA-PLL/antiNgR hydrogel at 8 weeks after implantation, which shows significant difference compared with HA-PLL or blank control group. Electron micrographs of implanted hydrogels showed that there were more cells and normal axons with myelin in the HA-PLL/antiNgR implant than that of HA-PLL hydrogel. The antiNgR grafted on HA hydrogels could be detected for 8 weeks after transplantation in vivo. All of these properties may facilitate HA-PLL/antiNgR hydrogels to become a promising scaffold for repairing spinal cord injury. Nevertheless, both two kinds of modified hydrogels (HA-PLL/antiNgR and HA-PLL) showed remarkable advantages in supporting angiogenesis, and simultaneously inhibiting the formation of glial scar. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 95B: 110-117, 2010.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available