4.5 Article

The advantages of three-dimensional culture in a collagen hydrogel for stem cell differentiation

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 101, Issue 10, Pages 2838-2845

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34578

Keywords

three-dimensional culture; collagen hydrogel; stem cell; differentiation efficiency; osteoblast

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23659161] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated the advantages of three-dimensional (3D) culture in a collagen hydrogel for stem cell differentiation, including the morphology of differentiated cells, differentiation efficiency of stem cells from aged rat and cells after passaging and freeze/thawing. Rat mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from young and aged rats, and MSCs after passaging and freeze/thawing were induced to differentiate into osteoblasts in 3D and 2D cultures, and histological studies were performed. Differentiation efficiency was evaluated by markers of osteoblastic differentiation including Runx2 and osterix gene expressions, osteocalcin secretion and calcium deposition. MSCs were stained positive for alkaline phosphatase in 3D and 2D cultures. However, the morphology of differentiated cells in 3D culture, which was different from that in 2D culture, was similar to that of osteoblasts in vivo. Markers of osteoblastic differentiation in MSCs from aged rats in 3D culture were higher than those in MSCs from young rats in 2D culture. Markers of osteoblastic differentiation in MSCs after passaging and freeze/thawing in 3D culture were higher than those in nonpassaged MSCs in 2D culture. These results indicate that 3D culture in a collagen hydrogel has advantages for the differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts with a similar phenotype to that of in vivo, when using even MSCs from aged donors or after passaging and freeze/thawing. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 101A: 2838-2845, 2013.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available