4.5 Article

Effect of cell-seeded hydroxyapatite scaffolds on rabbit radius bone regeneration

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 102, Issue 5, Pages 1458-1466

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34834

Keywords

hydroxyapatite; bone; mesenchymal stem cells; rabbit radius; callus

Funding

  1. U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command
  2. Department of Defense

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Highly porous hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds were developed as bone graft substitutes using a template coating process, characterized, and seeded with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). To test the hypothesis that cell-seeded HA scaffolds improve bone regeneration, HA scaffolds without cell seeding (HA-empty), HA scaffolds with 1.5 x 10(4) BMSCs (HA-low), and HA scaffolds with 1.5 x 10(6) BMSCs (HA-high) were implanted in a 10-mm rabbit radius segmental defect model for 4 and 8 weeks. Three different fluorochromes were administered at 2, 4, and 6 weeks after implantation to identify differences in temporal bone growth patterns. It was observed from fluorescence histomorphometry analyses that an increased rate of bone infiltration occurred from 0 to 2 weeks (p < 0.05) of implantation for the HA-high group (2.9 +/- 0.5 mm) as compared with HA-empty (1.8 +/- 0.8 mm) and HA-low (1.3 +/- 0.2 mm) groups. No significant differences in bone formation within the scaffold or callus formation was observed between all groups after 4 weeks, with a significant increase in bone regenerated for all groups from 4 to 8 weeks (28.4% across groups). Although there was no difference in bone formation within scaffolds, callus formation was significantly higher in HA-empty scaffolds (100.9 +/- 14.1 mm(3)) when compared with HA-low (57.8 +/- 7.3 mm(3); p <= 0.003) and HA-high (69.2 +/- 10.4 mm(3); p <= 0.02) after 8 weeks. These data highlight the need for a better understanding of the parameters critical to the success of cell-seeded HA scaffolds for bone regeneration. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 102A: 1458-1466, 2014.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available