4.5 Article

Confocal Raman microspectroscopic study of folate receptor-targeted delivery of 6-mercaptopurine-embedded gold nanoparticles in a single cell

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 100A, Issue 5, Pages 1221-1228

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.33294

Keywords

gold nanoparticles; folate-receptor target; drug delivery; anticancer effect; confocal Raman microspectroscopy

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [2011-0001316, 2011-0020504]
  2. KRCF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the cellular uptake behaviors and efficacy of folate-coated gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) for the targeted drug delivery system in human cancer cells. Folate-conjugated AuNPs embedded with a purine analogue cancer drug of 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) were assembled via a 1-ethyl-3-[3-dimethylaminopropyl] carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) coupling reaction between the amino group of 4-aminobenzenethiol (ABT) and the carboxyl group of folic acid. The assembly of folate and 6MP on AuNPs has been examined by absorption spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and confocal Raman spectroscopy. The internalization of the conjugated AuNPs inside the folate receptor-positive HeLa and KB cells was checked by TEM and dark-field microscopy (DFM) combined with label-free confocal spectroscopy over the depth variable z at a micrometer resolution. DFM live cell imaging of folate-conjugated AuNPs in HeLa cells indicated that the targeted AuNPs appeared to attach on the cell surfaces and enter into the cell with an hour. The cell viability was also compared to estimate the efficacy of folate-conjugated AuNP delivery systems. Folate receptor-targeted AuNP systems appeared to decrease cancer cell viability both in vitro and in vivo more than did the use of the 6MP-coated AuNPs drug without any targeting systems. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A:, 2012.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available