4.5 Article

Gene expression during S. epidermidis biofilm formation on biomaterials

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 100A, Issue 11, Pages 2863-2869

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34221

Keywords

Staphylococcus epidermidis; biofilm; genetics; biomaterials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biomaterial-centered infections are initiated by adhesion of bacteria to an implant, followed by colonization and mature biofilm formation. Staphylococcus epidermidis is commonly identified as the cause of these device-centered infections. This study used an in vitro model to evaluate temporal changes in the expression of genesicaADBC, agrBDCA, aap, and atlethat have been identified to play a role in the pathogenesis of S. epidermidis infections. Real-time reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction was used to determine changes in gene expression from S epidermidis biofilm grown on polyurethanes (Elasthane 80A, hydrophobic) modified with polyethylene oxide (Elasthane 80A6PEO, hydrophilic) and fluorocarbon (Elasthane 80A6F, hydrophobic). In vitro expression of the ica locus, which is involved in initial adhesion and intracellular aggregation, increased up to 100-fold from 2 to 48 h, whereas gene expression for autolysin AtlE decreased slightly from 2 to 12 h, followed by a 10-fold increase by 48 h. Upregulation of the aap gene associated with bacterial accumulation and the agr quorum-sensing system was observed during biofilm formation over 48 h. In addition, no correlation was observed between S. epidermidis gene expression and biomaterial surface chemistry. This study used an in vitro model to demonstrate that enhanced expression of the atle, aap, agr, and ica genes plays an important role in initial foreign body colonization and potentially in the establishment of a device-associated infection. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 100A:28632869, 2012.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available