4.5 Article

Tubular perfusion system culture of human mesenchymal stem cells on poly-L-lactic acid scaffolds produced using a supercritical carbon dioxide-assisted process

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 100A, Issue 10, Pages 2563-2572

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34191

Keywords

supercritical fluids; scaffold; PLLA; human mesenchymal stem cells; tissue engineering; bioreactor

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AR061460]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In vitro human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) proliferation and differentiation is dependent on scaffold design parameters and specific culture conditions. In this study, we investigate how scaffold microstructure influences hMSC behavior in a perfusion bioreactor system. Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) scaffolds are fabricated using supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) gel drying. This production method results in scaffolds fabricated with nanostructure. To introduce a microporous structure, porogen leaching was used in addition to this technique to produce scaffolds of average pore size of 100, 250, and 500 mu m. These scaffolds were then cultured in static culture in well plates or dynamic culture in the tubular perfusion system (TPS) bioreactor. Results indicated that hMSCs were able to attach and maintain viability on all scaffolds with higher proliferation in the 250 mu m and 500 mu m pore sizes of bioreactor cultured scaffolds and 100 mu m pore size of statically cultured scaffolds. Osteoblastic differentiation was enhanced in TPS culture as compared to static culture with the highest alkaline phosphatase expression observed in the 250 mu m pore size group. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 was also analyzed and expression levels were highest in the 250 mu m and 500 mu m pore size bioreactor cultured samples. These results demonstrate cellular response to pore size as well as the ability of dynamic culture to enhance these effects. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 100A:2563-2572, 2012.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available