4.5 Article

Inflammatory response induced by candidate biomaterials of an implantable microfabricated sensor

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 100A, Issue 5, Pages 1142-1150

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34054

Keywords

biocompatibility; complement; cytokine; immune response; implantable device

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway, BIA [174392]
  2. Lifecare AS, Bergen, Norway

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The implantation of synthetic medical devices is known to generate an immediate and complex material-related inflammatory response. Consequently, 15 candidate materials for a new microfabricated sensor were investigated. A human whole blood model that permits the interaction of all the putative inflammatory systems was used. The experiments were performed by administering 500 mu L of lepirudin-anticoagulated blood in each well of a 24-well polystyrene microtiter plate preloaded with the respective materials. The degree of inflammation was evaluated by assessing four complement activation markers, six proinflammatory cytokines, and chemokines, the expression of monocyte tissue factor (TF), as well as platelet activation. The complement system was inhibited with the C5-inhibitor eculizumab. Three of the materials distinctly activated complement through the alternative pathway, whereas the rest of the materials were virtually inert. Notably, the same three materials induced a marked and selective expression of TF as well as the release of five of the six cytokines. All these increases were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Inhibition of complement by the C5-inhibitor virtually abolished TF expression and markedly reduced several of the cytokines, suggesting that complement is a particularly useful tool to reveal the immediate inflammatory-inducing properties of these biomaterials. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A:, 2012.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available