4.5 Article

Comparably accelerated vascularization by preincorporation of aortic fragments and mesenchymal stem cells in implanted tissue engineering constructs

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 97A, Issue 4, Pages 383-394

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.33069

Keywords

angiogenesis; intravital fluorescence microscopy; dorsal skinfold chamber; microcirculation; scaffold

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [RU 1224/1-1,2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The demanding need for tissue replacement resulted in manifold approaches for the construction of different tissues. One common problem which hampers the clinical usage of tissue engineering constructs is a limited vascularization. In an attempt to accelerate the vascularization of tissue engineering constructs we compared the usage of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (bmMSCs) and fragments derived from the aorta in vivo. Tissue engineering constructs composed of PLGA scaffolds containing Matrigel (n = 8), aortic fragments embedded in Matrigel (n = 8), bmMSCs embedded in Matrigel (n = 8), and aortic fragments embedded in Matrigel combined with bmMSCs (n = 8) were implanted into dorsal skinfold chambers of balb/c mice and analyzed repetitively over 14 days. In all groups a weak inflammatory response was transiently apparent. Vascularization was significantly (p = 0.05) accelerated in bmMSC and aortic fragments containing constructs compared with Matrigel alone, demonstrated by a distinctly increased microvascular density throughout the whole experiment. The combination of bmMSCs and aortic fragments showed no additional effect compared with bmMSCs and aortic fragments alone. The accelerated vascularization and microvascular density of tissue engineering constructs triggered by bmMSCs and aortic fragments is comparable. Thus aortic fragments provide a new promising source for clinical relevant tissue engineering constructs. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 97A: 383-394, 2011.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available