4.5 Article

Antibacterial effects of sol-gel-derived bioactive glass nanoparticle on aerobic bacteria

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 94A, Issue 1, Pages 160-168

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32678

Keywords

antibacterial activity; aerobic bacteria; bioactive glass; nanoparticles; sol-gel processes

Funding

  1. Isfahan University of Technology
  2. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
  3. Torabinejad Dental Research Center [187038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this work was to evaluate the antibacterial effect of bioactive glass nanopowders. The 58S, 63S, and 72S compositions were prepared via the sot-gel technique. Characterization techniques such as X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Zeta-sizer, and X-ray fluorescent were used. The antibacterial activity was studied using Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhi, and Staphylococcus aureus. Cytotoxicity of the samples was evaluated using mouse fibroblast L929 cell line. The chemical compositions of the prepared samples were as predicted, and the particle size of the samples with an amorphous structure mainly ranged over 20-90 nm. At broth concentrations below 50 mg/mL, they showed no antibacterial activity. The 58S showed the highest antibacterial activity with the mini-mum bactericidal concentrations of 50 and 100 mg/mL for E. coli plus S. aureus and for P. aeruginosa, respectively. The 63S exhibited bactericidal and bacteriostatic effects on E. coli and S. aureus at concentrations of 100 and 50 mg/mL, respectively, at an minimum bactericidal concentrations of 100 mg/mL. However, 72S bioactive glass nanopowder showed no antibacterial effect. They showed no cytotoxicity. It was concluded that bioactive glass nanopowders could be considered as good candidates for the treatment of oral bone defects and root canal disinfection. (c) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 94A: 160-168, 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available