4.5 Article

Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in chitosan scaffolds with double micro and macroporosity

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 95A, Issue 4, Pages 1182-1193

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32906

Keywords

chitosan; macroporous scaffolds; mesenchymal stem cells; tissue engineering

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education [MAT2007-66759-C03-01]
  2. Science and Innovation Ministry [PTA2008-0943-P]
  3. Generalitat Valenciana (Grups d'investigacio Emergents) [GV/2009/126]
  4. VI National RDi Plan
  5. Iniciativa Ingenio
  6. Consolider Program
  7. CIBER Actions
  8. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  9. FCT [PTDC/QUI/68804/2006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bone Marrow mesenchymal stem cells can be induced to differentiate into osteoblasts to regenerate damaged bone tissue using tissue engineering techniques. In this study, we examine the use of chitosan scaffolds with double pore structure prepared by an innovative method that combines freeze gelation (that produces micropores) and particle leaching out technique (that produces interconnected spherical macropores) seeking to enhance the osteogenic differentiation of goat bone marrow stromal cells (GBMSCs). The double pore architecture of the scaffold was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), microcomputed tomography and confocal laser scanning microscopy. The obtained hierarchical pore structure allowed very efficient seeding of GBMSCs that are able to occupy the whole volume of the scaffold, showing good adhesion and proliferation. GBMSCs were differentiated into osteoblasts as indicated by alkaline phosphatase activity and osteocalcin expression. The results of this study demonstrate that chitosan scaffold may be promising biomaterial for bone regeneration. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 95A: 1182-1193,2010.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available