4.5 Article

Physico/chemical characterization and in vivo evaluation of nanothickness bioceramic depositions on alumina-blasted/acid-etched Ti-6Al-4V implant surfaces

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 90A, Issue 2, Pages 351-361

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32097

Keywords

implant surface; bioceramic; nanothickness; surface characterization; animal model; histomorphometric; biomechanical

Funding

  1. Bicon, LLC, Boston, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to physico/chemically characterize and evaluate the in vivo performance of two nanothickness ion beam assisted depositions (IBAD) of bioceramic coatings on implants in a beagle model. Alumina-blasted/acid-etched (AB/AE) Ti-6Al-4V implants were subjected to two different IBAD depositions (IBAD I and IBAD 11), which were physico/chemically characterized by SEM, EDS, XPS, XPS + ion-beam milling (depth profiling), XRD, AFM, and ToF-SIMS. A beagle dog tibia model was utilized for histomorphometric and biomechanical (torque) comparison between AB/AE, IBAD I, BAD II, and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite (PSHA) coated implants that remained hi vivo for 3 and 5 weeks. The coatings were characterized as amorphous Ca-P with high Ca/P stoichiometries with thicknesses of an order of magnitude difference (IBAD I = 30-50 nm and IBAD II = 300-500 nm). The histomorphometric and biomechanical testing results showed that the 300-500 nm thickness deposition (IBAD II) and PSHA positively modulated bone healing at early implantation times. (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 90A: 351-361, 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available