4.5 Article

Structural characterization and cell response evaluation of electrospun PCL membranes: Micrometric versus submicrometric fibers

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 89A, Issue 4, Pages 1028-1039

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32048

Keywords

electrospinning; tissue engineering; poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL); electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS); HUVEC; morphological study

Funding

  1. PRIN 2006 Funding

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrospinning is a valuable technique to fabricate fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. The typical nonwoven architecture allows cell adhesion and proliferation, and supports diffusion of nutrients and waste products. Poly(F-caprolactone) (PCL) electrospun membranes were produced starting from 14% w/v solutions in (a) mixture 1:1 tetrahydrofuran and N,N-dimethylformamide and (b) chloroform. Matrices made up of randomly arranged uniform fibers free of beads were obtained. The average fiber diameters were (a) 0.8 +/- 0.2 mu m and (b) 3.6 +/- 0.8 pm. PCL matrices showed the following tensile mechanical properties: tensile modulus (a) 5.0 +/- 0.7 MPa (b) 6.4 +/- 0.2 MPa, yield stress (a) 0.55 +/- 0.06 MPa (b) 0.43 +/- 0.02 MPa, and ultimate tensile stress (a) 1.7 +/- 0.2 MPa and (b) 0.8 +/- 0.1 MPa. The ultimate strain ranged between 300% and 400%. Cytotoxicity of electrospun membranes was continuously evaluated by means of electric cell-substrate impedance sensing technique using human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). PCL matrices resulted free of toxic amounts of contaminants and/or process by-products. In vitro studies performed by culturing HUVEC on micrometric and submicrometric fibrous mats showed that both structures supported cell adhesion and spreading. However, cells cultured on the micrometric network showed higher vitality and improved interaction with the polymeric fibers, suggesting an increased ability to promote cell colonization. (c) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 89A: 1028-1039, 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available