4.5 Article

A versatile mesoindentation system to evaluate the micromechanical properties of soft, hydrated substrates on a cellular scale

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 90A, Issue 4, Pages 1206-1217

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32178

Keywords

microindentation; Young's modulus; agarose; poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate); spinal cord tissue; viscoelasticity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has become increasingly important to study mechanical properties of substrates on the cellular scale since cells sense and respond to changes in the microenvironment in which they are grown. To study the effects of mechanical substrate properties on the cellular scale, an existing microindentation system has been modified to perform indentation tests on highly hydrated polymeric substrates and tissues. The highly sensitive, modified indentation system, labeled as a mesoindenter, is versatile and can be customized to perform a variety of tests useful for studying tissue mechanics, stress relaxation in polymers, and interfacial adhesion phenomena. To validate the efficacy and accuracy of the system, soft, hydrated hydrogels made from agarose (1-5 wt %), poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (p(HEMA)) (60-90% water), and unfixed, saline-perfused rat spinal cord tissue were tested. The results demonstrate that moduli vary with water content and are in line with previously published studies. We also demonstrate that the modulus of hydrogels is sensitive to the preload applied, with modulus increasing with preload. Stress relaxation indentation testing of p(HEMA) showed relaxation behavior that can be modeled using a heredity integral and standard linear model. The mesoindenter is versatile, capable of scanning and testing immersed samples, and easily customized to ascertain mechanical properties of substrates ranging from the kPa to GPa range. (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 90A: 12061217, 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available