4.5 Article

Tissue response and orbital floor regeneration using cyclic acetal hydrogels

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 90A, Issue 3, Pages 819-829

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32131

Keywords

orbital floor; bone tissue engineering; biomaterials; hydrogel; cyclic acetal

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [BES 0448684, BES 0632188]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Orbital floor injuries are a common form of traumatic craniofacial injury that may not heal properly through the body's endogenous response. Reconstruction is often necessary, and an optimal method does not exist. We propose a tissue engineering approach for orbital bone repair based upon a cyclic acetal biomaterial formed from 5-ethyl-5-(hydroxymethyl)-beta,beta-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-2-ethanol diacrylate (EHD) and poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA). The EHD monomer and PEGDA polymer may be fabricated into an EH-PEG hydrogel by radical polymerization. The objectives of this work were to Study (1) the tissue response to EH-PEG hydrogels in an orbital bone defect and (2) the induction of bone formation by delivery of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) from EH-PEG hydrogels. EH-PEG hydrogeis were fabricated and implanted into an 8-mm, rabbit orbital floor defect. Experimental groups included unloaded EH-PEG hydrogels, and EH-PEG hydrogels containing 0.25 mu g and 2.5 mu g BMP-2/implant. Results demonstrated that the unloaded hydrogel was initially bordered by a fibrin clot and then by fibrous encapsulation. BMP-2 loaded EH-PEG hydrogels, independent of concentration, were surrounded by fibroblasts at both time points. Histological analysis also demonstrated that significant bone growth was present at the 2.5 mu g BMP-2/implant group at 28 days. This work demonstrates that the EH-PEG construct is a viable option for use and delivery of BMP-2 in vivo. (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 90A: 819-829, 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available