4.5 Article

Older adults have unstable gait kinematics during weight transfer

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 45, Issue 9, Pages 1559-1565

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.04.021

Keywords

Older persons; Gait; Dynamical stability; Lyapunov exponent

Funding

  1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  2. Health Authorities of Mid Norway

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present article investigates gait stability of healthy older persons during weight transfer. Ten healthy older persons and ten younger persons walked 10 min each on a treadmill at 3 different gait speeds. The intra-stride change in gait stability was defined by the local divergence exponent lambda(t) estimated by a newly developed method. The intra-stride changes in lambda(t) during weight transfer were identified by separating each stride into a single and double support phase. The intra-stride changes in lambda(t) were also compared to changes in the variation of the gait kinematics, i.e., SD(t). The healthy older persons walked at the same preferred walking speed as the younger persons. However, they exhibited significantly larger lambda(t) (p <0.001) during weight transfer in the double support phase. Local divergence was closely related to intra-stride changes in SD(t) of the feet in the anterior-posterior direction. Furthermore, a high correlation was found between local divergence and the variation in step length and step width for both older (R > 0.67, p < 0.05) and younger persons (R > 0.67, p < 0.05). The present results indicate that the gait kinematics of older adults are more dynamical unstable during the weight transfer compared to younger persons. Furthermore, a close relationship exists between intra-stride changes in dynamical stability and variation in step length and step width. Further work will validate the results of the present study using real-life perturbations of the gait kinematics of both younger and older adults. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available