4.5 Article

Changes in running mechanics and spring-mass behavior induced by a mountain ultra-marathon race

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 1104-1107

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.01.028

Keywords

Fatigue; Ultra-endurance; Step kinematics; Stiffness

Funding

  1. Saint-Etienne Metropole

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Changes in running mechanics and spring-mass behavior due to fatigue induced by a mountain ultra-marathon race (MUM, 166 km, total positive and negative elevation of 9500 m) were studied in 18 ultra-marathon runners. Mechanical measurements were undertaken pre- and 3 h post-MUM at 12 km h(-1) on a 7 m long pressure walkway: contact (t(c)) aerial (t(a)) times, step frequency (f), and running velocity (v) were sampled and averaged over 5-8 steps. From these variables, spring-mass parameters of peak vertical ground reaction force (F-max), vertical downward displacement of the center of mass (Delta z), leg length change (Delta L), vertical (k(vert)) and leg (k(leg)) stiffness were computed. After the MUM, there was a significant increase in f (5.9 +/- 5.5%; P < 0.001) associated with reduced t(a) (-18.5 +/- 17.4%; P < 0.001) with no change in t(c), and a significant decrease in both Delta z and F-max (-11.6 +/- 10.5 and -6.3 +/- 7.3%, respectively; P < 0.001). k(vert) increased by 5.6 +/- 11.7% (P=0.053), and k(leg) remained unchanged. These results show that 3 h post-MUM, subjects ran with a reduced vertical oscillation of their spring-mass system. This is consistent with (i) previous studies concerning muscular structure/function impairment in running and (ii) the hypothesis that these changes in the running pattern could be associated with lower overall impact (especially during the braking phase) supported by the locomotor system at each step, potentially leading to reduced pain during running. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available