4.5 Article

Forces and deformations of the abdominal wall-A mechanical and geometrical approach to the linea alba

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 600-606

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.11.021

Keywords

Abdominal wall; Elasticity; Linea alba; Stress analysis; Tension

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Force-elongation responses of the human abdominal wall in the linea alba region were determined by tensile tests in which the linea alba was seen to exhibit a nonlinear elastic, anisotropic behavior as is frequently observed in soft biological tissues. In addition, the geometry of the abdominal wall was determined, based on MRI data. The geometry can be specified by principal radii of curvature in longitudinal of approximately 470 mm and in the transverse direction of about 200 mm. The determined radii agree with values found in other studies. Mechanical stresses, deformations and abdominal pressures for load cases above 6% elongation can be related using Laplace's formula and our constitutive and geometrical findings. Results from uni- and biaxial tensile tests can thus be compared using this model. Calculations confirm that abdominal pressures of approximately 20 kPa correspond to related biaxial forces of about 3.4 N/mm in the transverse and 1.5 N/mm in the longitudinal direction. Young's moduli can be calculated with respect to the uniaxial as well as the biaxial loading. At these physiological loadings, a compliance ratio of about 2:1 between the longitudinal and transversal directions is found. Young's moduli of about 50 kPa occur in transversal direction and of about 20 kPa in longitudinal direction at transverse and longitudinal strains both in the order of 6%. These findings coincide with results from other investigations in which the properties of the abdominal wall have been examined. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available