4.5 Article

Accuracy of single-plane fluoroscopy in determining relative position and orientation of total knee replacement components

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 784-787

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.033

Keywords

Knee; Joint kinematics; Fluoroscopy; Accuracy

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Human Mobility Research Centre at Queen's University/Kingston General Hospital
  3. Zimmer Inc., Warsaw, Indiana

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The accuracy of estimating the relative pose between knee replacement components, in terms of clinical motion, is important in the study of knee joint kinematics. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of the single-plane fluoroscopy method in calculating the relative pose between the femoral component and the tibial component, along knee motion axes, while the components were in motion relative to one another. The kinematics of total knee replacement components were determined in vitro using two simultaneous methods: single-plane fluoroscopic shape matching and an optoelectronic motion tracking system. The largest mean differences in relative pose between the two methods for any testing condition were 2.1 degrees, 0.3 degrees, and 1.1 degrees in extension, abduction, and internal rotation respectively, and 1.3, 0.9, and 1.9 mm in anterior, distal, and lateral translations, respectively. For the optimized position of the components during dynamic trials, the limits of agreement, between which 95% of differences can be expected to fall, were -2.9 to 4.5 degrees in flexion, -0.9 to 1.5 degrees in abduction, -2.4 to 2.1 degrees in external rotation, -2.0 to 3.9 mm in anterior-posterior translation, -2.2 to 0.4 mm in distal-proximal translation and -7.2 to 8.6 mm in medial-lateral translation. These mean accuracy values and limits of agreement can be used to determine whether the shape-matching approach using single-plane fluoroscopic images is sufficiently accurate for an intended motion tracking application. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available