4.5 Article

The efficacy of using vibrometry to detect osteointegration of the Agility total ankle

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 43, Issue 9, Pages 1840-1843

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.019

Keywords

Ankle; Arthroplasty; Vibrometry; Ultrasound; Osteointegration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arthritis is a chronic, debilitating disease affecting one in six people in the United States annually. One of the most promising surgical treatments is total joint replacement. After decades of development, some joint replacement (arthroplasty) systems such as the hip and knee enjoy high success rates while others, particularly newer ones for the ankle, have disappointing survival rates. The goal of this study was to investigate, develop, and test a methodology to assess implant osteointegration, specifically for the talar component of a total ankle prosthesis. A vibrometry technique using Doppler ultrasound was developed to non-invasively determine osteointegration clinically. This methodology was evaluated via preliminary experimentation, along with another validation methodology, to access whether design criteria have been met in order to initiate a clinical study of the technique. Bench-top and cadaveric testing demonstrated that the Doppler ultrasound technique could distinguish the level of osteointegration between loose and fixed implant components. The laser vibrometry technique, used for the validation of the ultrasound technique intraoperatively, was also shown to be functional and indicative of the ultrasound technique's testing results. This methodology can provide a much needed tool to determine the integration of implants non-invasively in the clinical and surgical setting, thus allowing each patient's rehabilitation program to be monitored and tailored to maximize the osteointegration and survival rate of their total joint replacement. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available