4.5 Article

Predicted threshold against backward balance loss following a slip in gait

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 41, Issue 9, Pages 1823-1831

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.04.005

Keywords

computational biomechanics; dynamic stability; optimization; adaptation; fall prevention

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG016727] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIA NIH HHS [NIH 2R01-AG16727, R01 AG016727-08, R01 AG016727] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to use a 7-link, moment-actuated human model to predict, at liftoff of the trailing foot in gait, the threshold of the center of mass (COM) velocity relative to the base of support (BOS) required to prevent backward balance loss during single stance recovery from a slip. Five dynamic optimization problems were solved to find the minimum COM velocities that would allow the simulation to terminate with the COM above the BOS when the COM started 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, and 1.25 foot lengths behind the heel of the stance foot (i.e., behind the BOS). The initial joint angles of the model were based on averaged data from experimental trials. Foot-ground contact was modeled using 16 visco-elastic springs distributed under the stance foot. Slipping was modeled by setting the sliding coefficient of friction of these springs to 0.02. The forward velocity of the COM necessary to avoid a backward balance loss is nearly two times larger under slip conditions under non-slip conditions. The predicted threshold for backward balance loss following a slip agreed well with experimental data collected from 99 young adults in response to 927 slips during walking. In all trials in which a subject's COM had a velocity below the predicted threshold, the subject's recovery foot landed posterior to the slipping foot as predicted. Finally, combining experimental data with optimization, we verified that the 7-link model could more accurately predict gait stability than a 2-link model. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available