4.5 Article

Cross-bridge induced force enhancement?

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 41, Issue 7, Pages 1611-1615

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.02.010

Keywords

skeletal muscle; laser trapping; force enhancement; cross-bridge; myosin II; duty ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When a muscle is stretched while activated, its steady-state isometric force following stretch is greater than the corresponding purely isometric force. This so-called residual force enhancement (RFE) has been observed for half a century, yet its mechanism remains unknown. Recent experiments suggest that RFE is not caused by non-uniformities in sarcomere lengths, as had been assumed for a long time, and cannot be explained primarily with increases in passive force, but is directly related to the kinetics of the cross-bridge cycle. Specifically, it has been suggested that stretching an attached cross-bridge increases its dwell time and duty ratio; therefore, the proportion of attached cross-bridges in a muscle would be increased by stretch, thereby causing RFE. A three bead laser trap setup was used for testing single cross-bridge (myosin II) interactions with actin. Upon attachment of a cross-bridge, a stretch or shortening of the cross-bridge was applied with a force of about 1.0 pN. The hypothesis that stretching a single cross-bridge increases its dwell time and duty ratio was rejected. However, stretching caused an increase in the average steady-state force per cross-bridge (3.4 +/- 0.4 pN; 17 = 433) compared to shortening (1.9 +/- 0.3 pN; n = 689). Therefore, based on the results of this study, RFE cannot be explained by an increased duty ratio and the associated increase in proportion of attached cross-bridges, but might be associated with an increased force per cross-bridge. (c) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available