4.4 Article

Osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells on micro-patterned surfaces

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS APPLICATIONS
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 862-871

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0885328211428094

Keywords

Osteogenesis; micropatterning; photolithography; biocompatibility; human mesenchymal stem cells

Funding

  1. Finska Lakaresallskapet
  2. National Graduate School of Musculoskeletal Diseases and Biomaterials
  3. Orion Farmos Research Foundation
  4. European Science Foundation
  5. Regenerative medicine, and Danish Council for Strategic Research `Individualized Musculoskeletal Medicine
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24791522, 24592252, 21591929] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Osteogenic responses of human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs) were compared on square-patterned, inverse square-patterned, and planar titanium, chromium, diamond-like carbon (DLC), and tantalum; hypothesis was that both the materials and patterns affect osteogenesis. Samples were produced using photolithography and physical vapor deposition. Early-marker alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and mid-markers, small body size and mothers against decapentaplegic-related protein-1 (SMAD1), runt-related transcription factor-2 (RUNX2), and osteopontin were studied using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. ALP and hydroxyapatite, were colorimetrically studied. ALP reached highest values on both patterned titanium samples, but mid-markers disclosed that it was already lagging behind planar and inverse patterned tantalum. Hydroxyapatite formation disclosed that osteo-induced hMSCs passed all the differentiation stages (except on planar chromium). Presence of hydroxyapatite disclosed that both types of patterning promoted (p < 0.001) osteogenesis compared to planar samples. Results suggest that the osseocompatibility/integration of implants could be improved by changing the monotonous and featureless implant-host interface into micro-patterned interface to provide physical differentiation cues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available