4.2 Article

Revisiting Spontaneous Internal Desynchrony Using a Quantitative Model of Sleep Physiology

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL RHYTHMS
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 441-453

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0748730411414163

Keywords

sleep; mathematical model; spontaneous desynchrony; internal desynchrony; self-selected schedule; bicircadian; behavioral input

Funding

  1. National Space Biomedical Research Institute through NASA [NCC 9-58, PF02101, HFP01603]
  2. National Institutes of Health [P01-AG009975, RC2-HL101340, K24-HL105664]
  3. Philips Respironics
  4. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd
  5. Actelion, Ltd.
  6. Bombardier, Inc.
  7. Boston Celtics
  8. Cephalon, Inc.
  9. Delta Airlines
  10. Eli Lilly and Co.
  11. Garda Siochana Inspectorate
  12. Global Ground Support
  13. Johnson Johnson
  14. Koninklijke Philips Electronics, NV
  15. Minnesota Timberwolves
  16. Portland Trail Blazers
  17. Philips Respironics, Inc
  18. Sanofi-Aventis, Inc.
  19. Sepracor, Inc.
  20. Sleep Multimedia, Inc
  21. Somnus Therapeutics, Inc.
  22. Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  23. Zeo, Inc
  24. American Academy of Sleep Medicine
  25. New England College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
  26. Cephalon, Inc
  27. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc
  28. George H. Kidder, Esq.
  29. Gerald McGinnis
  30. GlaxoSmithKline
  31. Jazz Pharmaceuticals
  32. Lilly USA
  33. Merck Co., Inc.
  34. Pfizer
  35. Praxair US Homecare
  36. ResMed
  37. Respironics, Inc.
  38. Select Comfort Corporation
  39. Sleep Health Centers, LLC
  40. Somaxon Pharmaceuticals
  41. Takeda Pharmaceuticals
  42. Tempur-Pedic
  43. Watermark Medical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Early attempts to characterize free-running human circadian rhythms generated three notable results: 1) observed circadian periods of 25 hours (considerably longer than the now established 24.1- to 24.2-hour average intrinsic circadian period) with sleep delayed to later circadian phases than during entrainment; 2) spontaneous internal desynchrony of circadian rhythms and sleep/wake cycles-the former with an approximately 24.9-hour period, and the latter with a longer (28-68 hour) or shorter (12-20 hour) period; and 3) bicircadian (48-50 hour) sleep/wake cycles. All three results are reproduced by Kronauer et al.'s (1982) coupled oscillator model, but the physiological basis for that phenomenological model is unclear. We use a physiologically based model of hypothalamic and brain stem nuclei to investigate alternative physiological mechanisms that could underlie internal desynchrony. We demonstrate that experimental observations can be reproduced by changes in two pathways: promotion of orexinergic (Orx) wake signals, and attenuation of the circadian signal reaching hypothalamic nuclei. We reason that delayed sleep is indicative of an additional wake-promoting drive, which may be of behavioral origin, associated with removal of daily schedules and instructions given to participants. We model this by increasing Orx tone during wake, which reproduces the observed period lengthening and delayed sleep. Weakening circadian input to the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus (possibly mediated by the dorsomedial hypothalamus) causes desynchrony, with observed sleep/wake cycle period determined by degree of Orx up-regulation. During desynchrony, sleep/wake cycles are driven by sleep homeostasis, yet sleep bout length maintains circadian phase dependence. The model predicts sleep episodes are shortest when started near the temperature minimum, consistent with experimental findings. The model also correctly predicts that it is possible to transition to bicircadian rhythms from either a synchronized or desynchronized state. Our findings suggest that feedback from behavioral choices to physiology could play an important role in spontaneous internal desynchrony.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available