4.4 Review

Bacterial metallothioneins: past, present, and questions for the future

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages 1011-1024

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00775-011-0790-y

Keywords

Zinc; Cadmium; Metal ion homeostasis; Cysteine; Histidine

Funding

  1. Royal Society
  2. European Commission
  3. BBSRC
  4. EPSRC
  5. Wellcome Trust
  6. Leverhulme Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacterial metallothioneins (MTs) have been known since the mid-1980s. The only family known until recently was the BmtA family, exemplified by the zinc- and cadmium-binding SmtA from the cyanobacterium Synechococcus PCC 7942, for which a structure was determined in 2001. Only in 2008 was a second type of bacterial MT identified in mycobacteria, and the copper-binding gene product was called MymT. Many of the features of SmtA either have been unexpected or are otherwise unusual, for example the presence of a zinc finger fold and the kinetic inertness of one of the four zinc ions bound to the protein. The unpredictability of molecular properties of this protein exemplified the need for continued biophysical studies of novel proteins. Homologues for SmtA have been identified in a limited number of bacterial genomes from cyanobacteria, pseudomonads, alphaproteobacteria, gammaproteobacteria, and firmicutes. Except for the residues defining the zinc finger fold, these homologous protein sequences display an intriguing variety, especially in terms of metal ligand position and identity. The increased number of homologues has allowed use of hidden Markov models to look for more remote relatives of SmtA, leading to the identification of a novel family of putative hybrid LIM domain MTs. However, database searches based on sequence similarity are of limited use for mining for further overlooked bacterial MTs, as so far undiscovered bacterial MTs may be too diverse from any other known MTs, and other approaches are required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available