4.4 Article

Ambidentate H-bonding by heme-bound NO: structural and spectral effects of -O versus -N H-bonding

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 613-621

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00775-008-0349-8

Keywords

heme; nitric oxide; H-bonding; backbonding; DFT

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM33576, R01 GM033576, R01 GM033576-39] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Resonance Raman studies have uncovered puzzling complexities in the structures of NO adducts of heme proteins. Although CO adducts of heme proteins obey well-behaved anti-correlations between Fe-C and C-O stretching frequencies, which reflect changes in backbonding induced by distal H-bonding residues, the corresponding NO data are scattered. This scatter can be traced to distal influences, since protein-free NO-hemes do show well-behaved anti-correlations. Why do distal effects produce irregularities in nu FeN/nu NO plots but not in nu FeC/nu CO plots? We show via density functional theory (DFT) computations on model systems that the response to distal H-bonding differs markedly when the NO acceptor atom is N versus O. Backbonding is augmented by H-bonding to O, but the effect of H-bonding to N is to weaken both N-O and N-Fe bonds. The resulting downward deviation from the nu FeN/nu NO backbonding line increases with increasing H-bond strength. This effect explains the deviations observed for a series of myoglobin variants, in which the strength of distal H-bonding is modulated by distal pocket residue substitutions. Most of the data follow a positive nu FeN/nu NO correlation with the same slope as that calculated for H-bonding to N. Such deviations are not observed for CO adducts, because the CO pi* orbital is unoccupied, and serves as a delocalized acceptor of H-bonds. H-bonding to N primes NO-heme for reduction to the HNO adduct, a putative intermediate in NO-reducing enzymes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available