4.6 Article

Crosstalk between Caveolin-1/Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase (ERK) and β-Catenin Survival Pathways in Osteocyte Mechanotransduction

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 288, Issue 12, Pages 8168-8175

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.437921

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AR059357]
  2. Fundacion Universitaria San Pablo CEU Grant [USPPPCO07/09]
  3. Conchita Rabago Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Osteocyte viability is a critical determinant of bone strength and is promoted by both mechanical stimulation and activation of the Wnt signaling pathway. Earlier studies demonstrated that both stimuli promote survival of osteocytes by activating the ERKs. Here, we show that there is interaction between the caveolin-1/ERK and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathways in the transduction of mechanical cues into osteocyte survival. Thus, ERK nuclear translocation and anti-apoptosis induced by mechanical stimulation are abolished by the Wnt antagonist Dkk1 and the beta-catenin degradation stimulator Axin2. Conversely, GSK3 beta phosphorylation and beta-catenin accumulation induced by mechanical stimulation are abolished by either pharmacologic inhibition of ERKs or silencing caveolin-1. In contrast, the canonical Wnt signaling inhibitor dominant-negative T cell factor does not alter ERK nuclear translocation or survival induced by mechanical stimulation. These findings demonstrate that beta-catenin accumulation is an essential component of the mechanotransduction machinery in osteocytes, albeit beta-catenin/T cell factor-mediated transcription is not required. The simultaneous requirement of beta-catenin for ERK activation and of ERK activation for beta-catenin accumulation suggests a bidirectional crosstalk between the caveolin-1/ERK and Wnt/beta-catenin pathways in mechanotransduction leading to osteocyte survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available