4.6 Article

SOX9 Regulates Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-related Protein 6 (LRP6) and T-cell Factor 4 (TCF4) Expression and Wnt/β-catenin Activation in Breast Cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 288, Issue 9, Pages 6478-6487

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.419184

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 DK079962]
  2. Dana-Farber/Harvard SPORE in Prostate Cancer Grant [P50 CA 090381]
  3. Dana-Farber/Harvard SPORE in Breast Cancer Grant [CA089393]
  4. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  5. Department of Defense [W81XWH-08-1-0160]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gene expression profiling has identified breast cancer (BCa) subtypes, including an aggressive basal-like (BL) subtype. The molecular signals underlying the behavior observed in BL-BCa group are largely unknown, although recent results indicate a prevalent increase in Wnt/beta-catenin activity. Our immunohistochemistry study confirmed that SOX9, one of the BL-BCa signature genes, was expressed by most BL-BCa, and its expression correlated with indicators of poor prognosis. Importantly, BCa gene expression profiling strongly associated SOX9 with the expression of Wnt/beta-catenin pathway components, LRP6 and TCF4. In cancer cell lines, SOX9 silencing reduced cell proliferation and invasion, LRP6 and TCF4 transcription, and decreased Wnt/beta-catenin activation. SOX9 expression was also increased by Wnt, indicating that SOX9 is at the center of a positive feedback loop that enhances Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Consistently, SOX9 overexpression in BCa cell lines and transgenic SOX9 expression in breast epithelium caused increased LRP6 and TCF4 expression and Wnt/beta-catenin activation. These results identify SOX9-mediated Wnt/beta-catenin activation as one of the molecular mechanisms underlying aberrant Wnt/beta-catenin activity in BCa, especially in the BL-BCa subgroup.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available