4.6 Article

T-cell Receptor Specificity Maintained by Altered Thermodynamics

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 288, Issue 26, Pages 18766-18775

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.464560

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H001085/1]
  2. Tenovus Foundation
  3. National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health [GM067079]
  4. Tenovus Ph.D. studentship
  5. Research Councils UK fellowship
  6. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) career development fellowship
  7. Wellcome Trust Research Career Development Fellowship [WT095767]
  8. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H001085/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Tenovus Cancer Care [PhD2009/L20] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. BBSRC [BB/H001085/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The T-cell receptor (TCR) recognizes peptides bound to major histocompatibility molecules (MHC) and allows T-cells to interrogate the cellular proteome for internal anomalies from the cell surface. The TCR contacts both MHC and peptide in an interaction characterized by weak affinity (K-D = 100 nM to 270 mu M). We used phage-display to produce a melanoma-specific TCR (alpha 24 beta 17) with a 30,000-fold enhanced binding affinity (K-D = 0.6 nM) to aid our exploration of the molecular mechanisms utilized to maintain peptide specificity. Remarkably, although the enhanced affinity was mediated primarily through new TCR-MHC contacts, alpha 24 beta 17 remained acutely sensitive to modifications at every position along the peptide backbone, mimicking the specificity of the wild type TCR. Thermodynamic analyses revealed an important role for solvation in directing peptide specificity. These findings advance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms that can govern the exquisite peptide specificity characteristic of TCR recognition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available