4.6 Article

T-cell Receptor (TCR)-Peptide Specificity Overrides Affinity-enhancing TCR-Major Histocompatibility Complex Interactions

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 289, Issue 2, Pages 628-638

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.522110

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Royal Society Grant [RG080077]
  2. Wellcome Trust Program Grant [WT086716MA]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Grant [BB/H001085/1]
  4. Tenovus Ph.D. studentship
  5. [WT095767]
  6. BBSRC [BB/H001085/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H001085/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Tenovus Cancer Care [PhD2009/L20] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Wellcome Trust [100327/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

alpha beta T-cell receptors (TCRs) engage antigens using complementarity-determining region (CDR) loops that are either germ line-encoded (CDR1 and CDR2) or somatically rearranged (CDR3). TCR ligands compose a presentation platform (major histocompatibility complex (MHC)) and a variable antigenic component consisting of a short foreign peptide. The sequence of events when the TCR engages its peptide-MHC (pMHC) ligand remains unclear. Some studies suggest that the germ line elements of the TCR engage the MHC prior to peptide scanning, but this order of binding is difficult to reconcile with some TCR-pMHC structures. Here, we used TCRs that exhibited enhanced pMHC binding as a result of mutations in either CDR2 and/or CDR3 loops, that bound to the MHC or peptide, respectively, to dissect the roles of these loops in stabilizing TCR-pMHC interactions. Our data show that TCR-peptide interactions play a strongly dominant energetic role providing a binding mode that is both temporally and energetically complementary with a system requiring positive selection by self-pMHC in the thymus and rapid recognition of non-self-pMHC in the periphery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available