4.6 Article

Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Controls M2 Macrophage Differentiation and Foam Cell Formation

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 287, Issue 15, Pages 11629-11641

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.338673

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01HL094818-0, P30 DK079333, P60 20579]
  2. American Diabetes Association [7-08-CR-08]
  3. Endocrine Society
  4. Endocrine Fellows Foundation
  5. National Institutes of Health National Center for Research Resources (a component of the National Institutes of Health) [UL1 RR024992, KL2 RR024994]
  6. National Institutes of Health Roadmap for Medical Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Macrophages are essential in atherosclerosis progression, but regulation of the M1 versus M2 phenotype and their role in cholesterol deposition are unclear. We demonstrate that endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is a key regulator of macrophage differentiation and cholesterol deposition. Macrophages from diabetic patients were classically or alternatively stimulated and then exposed to oxidized LDL. Alternative stimulation into M2 macrophages lead to increased foam cell formation by inducing scavenger receptor CD36 and SR-A1 expression. ER stress induced by alternative stimulation was necessary to generate the M2 phenotype through JNK activation and increased PPAR gamma expression. The absence of CD36 or SR-A1 signaling independently of modified cholesterol uptake decreased ER stress and prevented the M2 differentiation typically induced by alternative stimulation. Moreover, suppression of ER stress shifted differentiated M2 macrophages toward an M1 phenotype and subsequently suppressed foam cell formation by increasing HDL- and apoA-1-induced cholesterol efflux indicating suppression of macrophage ER stress as a potential therapy for atherosclerosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available