4.6 Article

Sequence Determinants of a Microtubule Tip Localization Signal (MtLS)

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 287, Issue 34, Pages 28227-28242

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.373928

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Federation of European Biochemical Societies (FEBS)
  2. Juan de la Cierva program
  3. Marie Curie Career Integration grant (EB-SxIP) [293831]
  4. Marie Curie IIF grant (MT-TIP Inhibitors) [253818]
  5. EMBO grant
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_122545, 310030B_138659]
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_122545] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microtubule plus-end-tracking proteins (+TIPs) specifically localize to the growing plus-ends of microtubules to regulate microtubule dynamics and functions. A large group of +TIPs contain a short linear motif, SXIP, which is essential for them to bind to end-binding proteins (EBs) and target microtubule ends. The SXIP sequence site thus acts as a widespread microtubule tip localization signal (MtLS). Here we have analyzed the sequence-function relationship of a canonical MtLS. Using synthetic peptide arrays on membrane supports, we identified the residue preferences at each amino acid position of the SXIP motif and its surrounding sequence with respect to EB binding. We further developed an assay based on fluorescence polarization to assess the mechanism of the EB-SXIP interaction and to correlate EB binding and microtubule tip tracking of MtLS sequences from different +TIPs. Finally, we investigated the role of phosphorylation in regulating the EB-SXIP interaction. Together, our results define the sequence determinants of a canonical MtLS and provide the experimental data for bioinformatics approaches to carry out genome-wide predictions of novel +TIPs in multiple organisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available