4.6 Article

Structural Characterization of Human Cytochrome P450 2C19 ACTIVE SITE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN P450s 2C8, 2C9, AND 2C19

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 287, Issue 53, Pages 44581-44591

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.424895

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health from NIGMS [R01GM031001]
  2. Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  3. National Institute of Health from NIGMS [P41GM103393]
  4. National Institutes of Health from NCRR [P41RR001209]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To identify the structural features underlying the distinct substrate and inhibitor profiles of P450 2C19 relative to the closely related human enzymes, P450s 2C8 and 2C9, the atomic structure (Protein Data Bank code 4GQS) of cytochrome P450 2C19 complexed with the inhibitor (2-methyl-1-benzo furan-3-yl)-(4-hydroxy- 3,5-dimethylphenyl) methanone (Protein Data Bank chemical component 0XV) was determined to 2.87 angstrom resolution by x-ray crystallography. The conformation of the peptide back-bone of P450 2C19 is most similar to that of P450 2C8, but the substrate-binding cavity of P450 2C8 is much larger than that of P450 2C19 due to differences in the amino acid residues that form the substrate-binding cavities of the two enzymes. In contrast, the substrate-binding cavity of P450 2C19 is much more similar in size to that of the structure of the P450 2C9 flurbiprofen complex than to that of a modified P450 2C9 or that of P450 2C8. The cavities of the P450 2C19 0XV complex and the P450 2C9 flurbiprofen complex differ, however, because the helix B-C loops of the two enzymes are dissimilar. These conformational differences reflect the effects of adjacent structural elements that interact with the B-C loops and that differ between the two enzymes. The availability of a structure for 2C19 will facilitate computational approaches for predictions of substrate and inhibitor binding to this enzyme.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available