4.6 Article

Alternative Splicing of a Protein Domain Indispensable for Function of Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 3 (TRPM3) Ion Channels

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 287, Issue 44, Pages 36663-36672

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.396663

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 530]
  2. Emmy-Noether Programm [GK 1326]
  3. Universitat des Saarlandes (Homburger Forschungsforderungsprogramm)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

TRPM3 channels form ionotropic steroid receptors in the plasma membrane of pancreatic beta and dorsal root ganglion cells and link steroid hormone signaling to insulin release and pain perception, respectively. We identified and compared the function of a number of TRPM3 splice variants present in mouse, rat and human tissues. Wefound that variants lacking a region of 18 amino acid residues display neither Ca2+ entry nor ionic currents when expressed alone. Hence, splicing removes a region that is indispensable for channel function, which is called the ICF region. TRPM3 variants devoid of this region (TRPM3 Delta ICF), are ubiquitously present in different tissues and cell types where their transcripts constitute up to 15% of the TRPM3 isoforms. The ICF region is conserved throughout the TRPM family, and its presence in TRPM8 proteins is also necessary for function. Within the ICF region, 10 amino acid residues form a domain essential for the formation of operative TRPM3 channels. TRPM3 Delta ICF variants showed reduced interaction with other TRPM3 isoforms, and their occurrence at the cell membrane was diminished. Correspondingly, coexpression of Delta ICF proteins with functional TRPM3 subunits not only reduced the number of channels but also impaired TRPM3-mediated Ca2+ entry. We conclude that TRPM3 Delta ICF variants are regulatory channel subunits fine-tuning TRPM3 channel activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available