4.6 Article

The LptD Chaperone LptE Is Not Directly Involved in Lipopolysaccharide Transport in Neisseria meningitidis

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 286, Issue 33, Pages 28688-28696

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.239673

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Netherlands Research Council for Earth and Life Sciences of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The biosynthesis of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in Gram-negative bacteria is well understood, in contrast to the transport to its destination, the outer leaflet of the outer membrane. In Escherichia coli, synthesis and transport of LPS are essential processes. Neisseria meningitidis, conversely, can survive without LPS and tolerates inactivation of genes involved in LPS synthesis and transport. Here, we analyzed whether the LptA, LptB, LptC, LptE, LptF, and LptG proteins, recently implicated in LPS transport in E. coli, function similarly in N. meningitidis. None of the analyzed proteins was essential in N. meningitidis, consistent with their expected roles in LPS transport and additionally demonstrating that they are not required for an essential process such as phospholipid transport. As expected, the absence of most of the Lpt proteins resulted in a severe defect in LPS transport. However, the absence of LptE did not disturb transport of LPS to the cell surface. LptE was found to be associated with LptD, and its absence affected total levels of LptD, suggesting a chaperone-like role for LptE in LptD biogenesis. The absence of a direct role of LptE in LPS transport was substantiated by bioinformatic analyses showing a low conservation of LptE in LPS-producing bacteria. Apparently, the role of LptE in N. meningitidis deviates from that in E. coli, suggesting that the Lpt system does not function in a completely conserved manner in all Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available