4.6 Article

Kir2.6 Regulates the Surface Expression of Kir2.x Inward Rectifier Potassium Channels

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 286, Issue 11, Pages 9526-9541

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.170597

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. American Heart Association Western Affiliate [0655234Y]
  2. Muscular Dystrophy Association [4137]
  3. Cottage Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Precise trafficking, localization, and activity of inward rectifier potassium Kir2 channels are important for shaping the electrical response of skeletal muscle. However, how coordinated trafficking occurs to target sites remains unclear. Kir2 channels are tetrameric assemblies of Kir2. x subunits. By immunocytochemistry we show that endogenous Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 are localized at the plasma membrane and T-tubules in rodent skeletal muscle. Recently, a new subunit, Kir2.6, present in human skeletal muscle, was identified as a gene in which mutations confer susceptibility to thyrotoxic hypokalemic periodic paralysis. Here we characterize the trafficking and interaction of wild type Kir2.6 with other Kir2. x in COS-1 cells and skeletal muscle in vivo. Immunocytochemical and electrophysiological data demonstrate that Kir2.6 is largely retained in the endoplasmic reticulum, despite high sequence identity with Kir2.2 and conserved endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi trafficking motifs shared with Kir2.1 and Kir2.2. We identify amino acids responsible for the trafficking differences of Kir2.6. Significantly, we show that Kir2.6 subunits can coassemble with Kir2.1 and Kir2.2 in vitro and in vivo. Notably, this interaction limits the surface expression of both Kir2.1 and Kir2.2. We provide evidence that Kir2.6 functions as a dominant negative, in which incorporation of Kir2.6 as a subunit in a Kir2 channel heterotetramer reduces the abundance of Kir2 channels on the plasma membrane.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available