4.6 Article

Nuclear Orphan Receptor NR4A2 Modulates Fatty Acid Oxidation Pathways in Colorectal Cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 286, Issue 34, Pages 30003-30009

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.184697

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI [5R01 DK062112]
  2. National Colorectal Cancer Research Alliance
  3. Ellen F. Knisley Distinguished Chair in Colon Cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although cancer cells have traditionally been thought to rely on the glycolytic pathway to generate ATP, recent studies suggest that cancer cells can shift to the fatty acid oxidation pathway as an alternative energy source. All of the factors that induce and regulate this adaptive shift in metabolism are not known. Cyclooxygenase-2-derived prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)) is produced at high levels in colon cancer, and multiple lines of evidence from human-, animal-, and cell line-based studies indicate that PGE(2) plays a pro-oncogenic role in colorectal cancer progression. We have shown previously that exposure of colon cancer cells to PGE(2) promotes cell survival, in part by inducing the expression of the nuclear orphan receptor NR4A2. Here, we report that PGE(2)-induced NR4A2 increased fatty acid oxidation by inducing the expression of multiple proteins in the fatty acid oxidation pathway. NR4A2 was found to bind directly to Nur77-binding response elements located within the regulatory region of these genes. Nur77-binding response element binding also resulted in the recruitment of transcriptional coactivators and induction of gene expression. Collectively, our findings suggest that NR4A2 plays a key role as a transcriptional integration point between the eicosanoid and fatty acid metabolic pathways. Thus, PGE(2) is a potential regulator of the adaptive shift to energy utilization via fatty acid oxidation that has been observed in several types of cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available