4.6 Article

The 90-kDa Heat-shock Protein (Hsp90)-binding Immunophilin FKBP51 Is a Mitochondrial Protein That Translocates to the Nucleus to Protect Cells against Oxidative Stress

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 286, Issue 34, Pages 30152-30160

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.256610

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Guggenheim Foundation
  2. Universidad de Buenos Aires
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica ProyectoS de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT PICT) [2010-1170]
  4. National Institutes of Health [R03TW008143-01A1]
  5. ANPCyT [PICT 2007-00640]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Confocal microscopy images revealed that the tetratricopeptide repeat motif (TPR) domain immunophilin FKBP51 shows colocalization with the specific mitochondrial marker MitoTracker. Signal specificity was tested with different antibodies and by FKBP51 knockdown. This unexpected subcellular localization of FKBP51 was confirmed by colocalization studies with other mitochondrial proteins, biochemical fractionation, and electron microscopy imaging. Interestingly, FKBP51 forms complexes in mitochondria with the glucocorticoid receptor and the Hsp90/Hsp70-based chaperone heterocomplex. Although Hsp90 inhibitors favor FKBP51 translocation from mitochondria to the nucleus in a reversible manner, TPR domain-deficient mutants of FKBP51 are constitutively nuclear and fully excluded from mitochondria, suggesting that a functional TPR domain is required for its mitochondrial localization. FKBP51 overexpression protects cells against oxidative stress, whereas FKBP51 knockdown makes them more sensitive to injury. In summary, this is the first demonstration that FKBP51 is a major mitochondrial factor that undergoes nuclear-mitochondrial shuttling, an observation that may be related to antiapoptotic mechanisms triggered during the stress response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available