4.6 Article

External Cu2+ Inhibits Human Epithelial Na+ Channels by Binding at a Subunit Interface of Extracellular Domains

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 286, Issue 31, Pages 27436-27446

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.232058

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 ES014701, K08 HL087932, P30 DK072506, P30 DK079307]
  2. Dialysis Clinic, Inc.
  3. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation RDP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epithelial Na+ channels (ENaCs) play an essential role in the regulation of body fluid homeostasis. Certain transition metals activate or inhibit the activity of ENaCs. In this study, we examined the effect of extracellular Cu2+ on human ENaC expressed in Xenopus oocytes and investigated the structural basis for its effects. External Cu2+ inhibited human alpha beta gamma ENaC with an estimated IC50 of 0.3 mu M. The slow time course and a lack of change in the current-voltage relationship were consistent with an allosteric (non pore-plugging) inhibition of human ENaC by Cu2+. Experiments with mixed human and mouse ENaC subunits suggested that both the alpha and beta subunits were primarily responsible for the inhibitory effect of Cu2+ on human ENaC. Lowering bath solution pH diminished the inhibition by Cu2+. Mutations of two alpha, two beta, and two gamma His residues within extracellular domains significantly reduced the inhibition of human ENaC by Cu2+. We identified a pair of residues as potential Cu2+-binding sites at the subunit interface between thumb subdomain of alpha hENaC and palm subdomain of beta hENaC, suggesting a counterclockwise arrangement of alpha, beta, and gamma ENaC subunits in a trimeric channel complex when viewed from above. We conclude that extracellular Cu2+ is a potent inhibitor of human ENaC and binds to multiple sites within the extracellular domains including a subunit interface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available