4.6 Article

Identification of a Chemoreceptor for Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle Intermediates DIFFERENTIAL CHEMOTACTIC RESPONSE TOWARDS RECEPTOR LIGANDS

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 285, Issue 30, Pages 23124-23134

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.110403

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Education [CICYT BIO-2006-05668, BFU 2005-0487-C02-02, CSD 2007-00010, BIO2008-04478-C03-03]
  2. Junta de Andalucia [CIV344, CIV1912, P09-RNM-4509]
  3. BBVA foundation
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [0919930] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [0919930] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the identification of McpS as the specific chemoreceptor for 6 tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates and butyrate in Pseudomonas putida. The analysis of the bacterial mutant deficient in mcpS and complementation assays demonstrate that McpS is the only chemoreceptor of TCA cycle intermediates in the strain under study. TCA cycle intermediates are abundantly present in root exudates, and taxis toward these compounds is proposed to facilitate the access to carbon sources. McpS has an unusually large ligand-binding domain (LBD) that is un-annotated in InterPro and is predicted to contain 6 helices. The ligand profile of McpS was determined by isothermal titration calorimetry of purified recombinant LBD (McpS-LBD). McpS recognizes TCA cycle intermediates but does not bind very close structural homologues and derivatives like maleate, aspartate, or tricarballylate. This implies that functional similarity of ligands, such as being part of the same pathway, and not structural similarity is the primary element, which has driven the evolution of receptor specificity. The magnitude of chemotactic responses toward these 7 chemoattractants, as determined by qualitative and quantitative chemotaxis assays, differed largely. Ligands that cause a strong chemotactic response (malate, succinate, and fumarate) were found by differential scanning calorimetry to increase significantly the midpoint of protein unfolding (T-m) and unfolding enthalpy (Delta H) of McpS-LBD. Equilibrium sedimentation studies show that malate, the chemoattractant that causes the strongest chemotactic response, stabilizes the dimeric state of McpS-LBD. In this respect clear parallels exist to the Tar receptor and other eukaryotic receptors, which are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available