4.2 Article

Colored Sticky Traps to Selectively Survey Thrips in Cowpea Ecosystem

Journal

NEOTROPICAL ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 96-101

Publisher

ENTOMOLOGICAL SOC BRASIL
DOI: 10.1007/s13744-015-0334-1

Keywords

Beneficial insects; color sticky trap; cowpea; insect monitoring

Categories

Funding

  1. Nature Science Foundation of Hainan Province [314104]
  2. Special fund for application technology research and development and demonstration and extension of Hainan province [ZDXM2015046]
  3. Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Public Research Institutes of China [2014hzs1J008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The bean flower thrips, Megalurothrips usitatus (Bagrall) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), is an important pest of legume crops in South China. Yellow, blue, or white sticky traps are currently recommended for monitoring and controlling thrips, but it is not known whether one is more efficient than the other or if selectivity could be optimized by trap color. We investigated the response of thrips and beneficial insects to different-colored sticky traps on cowpea, Vigna unguiculata. More thrips were caught on blue, light blue, white, and purple traps than on yellow, green, pink, gray, red, or black traps. There was a weak correlation on the number of thrips caught on yellow traps and survey from flowers (r = 0.139), whereas a strong correlation was found for blue traps and thrips' survey on flowers (r = 0.929). On commercially available sticky traps (JiaduoA (R)), two and five times more thrips were caught on blue traps than on white and yellow traps, respectively. Otherwise, capture of beneficial insects was 1.7 times higher on yellow than on blue traps. The major natural enemies were the predatory ladybird beetles (63%) and pirate bugs Orius spp. (29%), followed by a number of less representative predators and parasitoids (8%). We conclude the blue sticky trap was the best to monitor thrips on cowpea in South China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available