4.3 Article

Estimating the Endotracheal Tube Insertion Depth in Newborns Using Weight or Gestation: A Randomised Trial

Journal

NEONATOLOGY
Volume 107, Issue 3, Pages 167-172

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000369375

Keywords

Infant; Newborn; Endotracheal intubation; Birth weight; Gestational age; Randomised trial

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: When intubating newborns, clinicians aim to place the tip of the endotracheal tube (ETT) in the mid-trachea. Clinicians usually estimate the ETT insertion depth based on weight. Ell-tips are often incorrectly positioned in newborns. Estimating the insertion depth based on gestation may be more accurate. Objective: To determine whether estimating the ETT insertion depth using gestation, compared to weight, results in more correctly placed ETTs. Methods: Newborn infants without congenital anomalies who were intubated orally were randomised to having their ETT insertion depth estimated using weight [insertion depth (cm) = weight (kg) + 6] or gestation [value determined from a table]. The primary outcome was correct ETT position, defined as an ETT tip between the upper border of the first thoracic vertebra (T1) and the lower border of the second thoracic vertebra (T2) on a chest X-ray. The primary outcome was determined by one paediatric radiologist who was masked to group assignment. Results: Ninety infants were enrolled and the groups were well matched. The proportion of correctly placed ETTs was not significantly different between the groups [weight, 25/49 (51%), vs. gestation, 16/41(39%), p = 0.293]. We found no significant differences in the secondary outcomes measured. Conclusion: Estimating the ETT insertion depth in newborns using gestation compared to weight did not result in more correctly placed ETTs. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available