4.6 Article

β-Catenin Levels Influence Rapid Mechanical Responses in Osteoblasts

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 283, Issue 43, Pages 29196-29205

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M801907200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AR42360, AR52014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mechanical loading of bone initiates an anabolic, anticatabolic pattern of response, yet the molecular events involved in mechanical signal transduction are not well understood. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling has been recognized in promoting bone anabolism, and application of strain has been shown to induce beta-catenin activation. In this work, we have used a preosteoblastic cell line to study the effects of dynamic mechanical strain on beta-catenin signaling. We found that mechanical strain caused a rapid, transient accumulation of active beta-catenin in the cytoplasm and its translocation to the nucleus. This was followed by up-regulation of the Wnt/beta-catenin target genes Wisp1 and Cox2, with peak responses at 4 and 1 h of strain, respectively. The increase of beta-catenin was temporally related to the activation of Akt and subsequent inactivation of GSK3 beta, and caveolin-1 was not required for these molecular events. Application of Dkk-1, which disrupts canonical Wnt/LRP5 signaling, did not block strain-induced nuclear translocation of beta-catenin or up-regulation of Wisp1 and Cox2 expression. Conditions that increased basal beta-catenin levels, such as lithium chloride treatment or repression of caveolin-1 expression, were shown to enhance the effects of strain. In summary, mechanical strain activates Akt and inactivates GSK3 beta to allow beta-catenin translocation, and Wnt signaling through LRP5 is not required for these strain-mediated responses. Thus, beta-catenin serves as both a modulator and effector of mechanical signals in bone cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available