4.6 Article

Removal of the N-terminal Extension of Cardiac Troponin I as a Functional Compensation for Impaired Myocardial β-Adrenergic Signaling

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 283, Issue 48, Pages 33384-33393

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M803302200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL-078773, AR-048816]
  2. National Institutes of Health, NIDDK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although beta-adrenergic stimuli are essential for myocardial contractility, beta-blockers have a proven beneficial effect on the treatment of heart failure, but the mechanism is not fully understood. The stimulatory G protein alpha-subunit (G(s)alpha) couples the beta-adrenoreceptor to adenylyl cyclase and the intracellular cAMP response. In a mouse model of conditional G(s)alpha deficiency in the cardiac muscle (G(s)alpha-DF), we demonstrated heart failure phenotypes accompanied by increases in the level of a truncated cardiac troponin I (cTnI-ND) from restricted removal of the cTnI-specific N-terminal extension. To investigate the functional significance of the increase of cTnI-ND in G(s)alpha-DF cardiac muscle, we generated double transgenic mice to overexpress cTnI-ND in G(s)alpha-DF hearts. The overexpression of cTnI-ND in G(s)alpha-DF failing hearts increased relaxation velocity and left ventricular end diastolic volume to produce higher left ventricle maximum pressure and stroke volume. Supporting the hypothesis that up-regulation of cTnI-ND is a compensatory rather than a destructive myocardial response to impaired beta-adrenergic signaling, the aberrant expression of beta-myosin heavy chain in adult G(s)alpha-DF but not control mouse hearts was reversed by cTnI overexpression. These data indicate that the up-regulation of cTnI-ND may partially compensate for the cardiac inefficiency in impaired beta-adrenergic signaling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available