4.6 Article

Identification of the Major Phosphorylation Site in Bcl-xL Induced by Microtubule Inhibitors and Analysis of Its Functional Significance

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 283, Issue 51, Pages 35517-35525

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M805019200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA109821]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vinblastine and other microtubule inhibitors used as antimitotic cancer drugs characteristically promote the phosphorylation of the key anti-apoptotic protein, Bcl-xL. However, putative sites of phosphorylation have been inferred based on potential recognition by JNK, and no direct biochemical analysis has been performed. In this study we used protein purification and mass spectrometry to identify Ser-62 as a single major site in vivo. Site-directed mutagenesis confirmed Ser-62 to be the site of Bcl-xL phosphorylation induced by several microtubule inhibitors tested. Vinblastine-treated cells overexpressing a Ser-62 -> Ala mutant showed highly significantly reduced apoptosis compared with cells expressing wild-type Bcl-xL. Co-immunoprecipitation revealed that phosphorylation caused wild-type Bcl-xL to release bound Bax, whereas phospho-defective Bcl-xL retained the ability to bind Bax. In contrast, phospho-mimic (Ser-62 -> Asp) Bcl-xL exhibited a reduced capacity to bind Bax. Functional tests were performed by transiently co-transfecting Bax in the context of different Bcl-xL mutants. Co-expression of wild-type or phospho-defective Bcl-xL counteracted the adverse effects of Bax expression on cell viability, whereas phospho-mimic Bcl-xL failed to provide the same level of protection against Bax. These studies suggest that Bcl-xL phosphorylation induced by microtubule inhibitors plays a key pro-apoptotic role at least in part by disabling the ability of Bcl-xL to bind Bax.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available