4.6 Article

Asymmetry in the Lipid Affinity of Bihelical Amphipathic Peptides A STRUCTURAL DETERMINANT FOR THE SPECIFICITY OF ABCA1-DEPENDENT CHOLESTEROL EFFLUX BY PEPTIDES

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 283, Issue 47, Pages 32273-32282

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M804461200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. NHLBI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ApoA-I contains a tandem array of amphipathic helices with varying lipid affinity, which are critical in its ability to bind and remove lipids from cells by the ABCA1 transporter. In this study, the effect of asymmetry in the lipid affinity of amphipathic helices in a bihelical apoA-I mimetic peptide, 37pA, on lipid efflux by the ABCA1 transporter was examined. Seven peptide variants of 37pA were produced by substituting a varying number of hydrophobic amino acids for alanine on either one or both helices. The 5A peptide with five alanine substitutions in the second helix had decreased helical content compared with 37pA (5A, 12 +/- 1% helicity; 37pA, 28 +/- 2% helicity) and showed less self-association but, similar to the parent peptide, was able to readily solubilize phospholipid vesicles. Furthermore, 5A, unlike the parent peptide 37pA, was not hemolytic (37pA, 27 +/- 2% RBC lysis, 2 h, 18 mu M). Finally, the 5A peptide stimulated cholesterol and phospholipid efflux by the ABCA1 transporter with higher specificity (ABCA1-transfected versus untransfected cells) than 37pA(5A, 9.7 +/- 0.77%, 18 h, 18 mu M versus 1.5 +/- 0.27%, 18 h, 18 mu M (p < 0.0001); 37pA, 7.4 +/- 0.85%, 18h, 18 mu M versus 5.8 +/- 0.20%, 18h, 18 mu M(p = 0.03)). In summary, we describe a novel bihelical peptide with asymmetry in the lipid affinity of its helices and properties similar to apoA-I in terms of specificity for cholesterol efflux by the ABCA1 transporter and low cytotoxicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available