4.6 Article

A Common Human μ-Opioid Receptor Genetic Variant Diminishes the Receptor Signaling Efficacy in Brain Regions Processing the Sensory Information of Pain

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 284, Issue 10, Pages 6530-6535

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M807030200

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The single nucleotide polymorphism 118A > G of the human mu-opioid receptor gene OPRM1, which leads to an exchange of the amino acid asparagine (N) to aspartic acid (D) at position 40 of the extracellular receptor region, alters the in vivo effects of opioids to different degrees in pain-processing brain regions. The most pronounced N40D effects were found in brain regions involved in the sensory processing of pain intensity. Using the mu-opioid receptor-specific agonist DAMGO, we analyzed the mu-opioid receptor signaling, expression, and binding affinity in human brain tissue sampled postmortem from the secondary somatosensory area (S-II) and from the ventral posterior part of the lateral thalamus, two regions involved in the sensory processing and transmission of nociceptive information. We show that the main effect of the N40D mu-opioid receptor variant is a reduction of the agonist-induced receptor signaling efficacy. In the S-II region of homo- and heterozygous carriers of the variant 118G allele (n = 18), DAMGO was only 62% as efficient (p = 0.002) as in homozygous carriers of the wild-type 118A allele (n = 15). In contrast, the number of [H-3] DAMGO binding sites was unaffected. Hence, the mu-opioid receptor G-protein coupling efficacy in SII of carriers of the 118G variant was only 58% as efficient as in homozygous carriers of the 118A allele (p < 0.001). The thalamus was unaffected by the OPRM1 118A > G SNP. In conclusion, we provide a molecular basis for the reduced clinical effects of opioid analgesics in carriers of mu-opioid receptor variant N40D.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available